The only modelling I’ve done in the last few days is to weather a couple of Autocoaches for Nigel’s Unnycoombe layout. One in Carmine and Cream livery, and one in Maroon. Where possible I’ll use photos as a general guide and most of the colour shots I have of the mid sixties period show fairly clean sided coaches with dusty underframes and grimy ends. However on this one, once I’d done that, I just kept going, making it absolutely filthy. I fear it may now be over-done, but it’s difficult when looking at something in isolation away from the layout that it will be displayed on. I’m also finding the wash technique that I’ve used for years on larger scale models doesn’t work so well with N gauge. There is an underlying surface-tension in the paint which annoyingly doesn’t scale itself down to suit.
Wednesday, 2 December 2009
Have we been sold a puppy? I’m suddenly aware of how much RTR models cost and that relative cost compared to a few years ago. If I want to buy a new Bachmann Peak it’s going to cost me up to £74.00 (or £171.00 as the RM review states. In error I hope). My at a glance judgement would suggest that that’s around a 20% increase in under five years.
What have we got extra?
Better motor? Well no. The motors in the newer stuff actually seem lower quality if anything. The transmissions have improved, but as far as Bachmann is concerned that is a simple transfer from their U.S. models. What it appears to me that we’re getting is chips. And what are chips? Cheap. And do we want them?
A decade or so ago I built an American layout. Stocked with Athern, Bachmann and Atlas locos, none of which cost more than forty quid. They ran... faultlessly. No chips. So they’re not there for the running quality. Do they improve the appearance? Err... no. What is happening, by stealth if you like, is that we are being sold a new operating system. Why? Quite simple... there’s more money in it. There was a glass ceiling above which models wouldn’t sell. This way they will.
But the vast majority of us don’t need it. Most of us build reasonably simple one-man operated layouts that can be run prototypically (with a couple of exceptions) with existing wiring techniques. Exceptions might be independently running the original train engine out of a terminus immediately behind the departing stock. And when was the last time you saw that move carried out on a model?
This wholesale rush to DCC worries me slightly. It’s a system that can’t easily be repaired by the user and most of us don’t need it, but there is going to come a time, possibly in about fifteen months where every RTR model will be pre-fitted whether we like it or not.
I’m off, back to the three-rail with my head in the fire-bucket.
Sunday, 29 November 2009
Jump forward to this year and a Steve Flint plan in RM thinly disguised as a plug for the Bachmann 150 and PECO’s double slip. The afore mentioned biker and railway employee suggested at the time that the track layout was unlikely and would probably be mirrored. But. Even though this is probably true, the general idea of something rural, pre-privatisation, and post-rationalisation remained. Something stripped down, blue diesel and just about pre-pretty liveries.
There are two problems here: Firstly I know diddly-shit about the 1980’s (I think I was mostly sleeping). Secondly this will probably require stock that I have to buy, and not bodge out of card and bits of string. This is about me researching – with help from my old mate, and about buying things at knock down prices when I see them. The first case in point could be this: During the other night’s conversation scrap traffic was mentioned. Oh goody I thought 16 tonners! Err... no. It appears that by the notional date of 1986/7 they were gone. However. There was scrap traffic still carried in MDVs. The picture illustrating this information in the book was taken at an acute angle and the wagons looked like 16 tonners. Research led me to find that MDVs are these; what I think of as 24Ton minerals and only used for block coal trains. Traps everywhere. But these are vehicles I can spend some time with. I’m sure this is only the first step of what could be a long process and learning curve.
Photo: Paul Bartlett, from his excellent site on all things rail. http://ukrailrollingstock.fotopic.net/
Don’t forget to check out Nigel’s Norway stuff on the link to the right. Even if Scandiwegian is not your thing there are some great photos.
Friday, 27 November 2009
Ends from 30 thou and strip. Two bulkheads fitted. No seats. Pointless, you wouldn't see them. Roof strut fitted but not sanded to height.
Glazing is a little off from this angle. Roof from 20 thou and a sheet of toilet paper.
Wednesday, 18 November 2009
It's a good thing I'm virtually unemployed (who said unemployable?).
These multiple projects stop boredom especially of they are one hit small work-pieces such as stock and I know I'm not alone in this wanderlust of model rail.
Sunday, 15 November 2009
The completed Egger conversion; well, Egger diesel with a dog kennel on the front!
Bill of fare was: One Eggerbahn works diesel, 30 thou plasticard, diabetic urine dip stick (really!) N gauge picket gate, Airfix figure, Greenwich coupling, paint. All of which was in stock so current cost nil. The Egger mechs are variable, some good, some dreadful. This is somewhere in the middle, but is only destined for a back-up role on Garn. There are in the cupboard, three Wild West locos, bought for £25 a piece I think. I may use one of these as the basis for a boxy Sentinal; I have all the info, drawings etc, so once again it’s just a little plasticard and paint.
Wednesday, 11 November 2009
The title of this being like something out of 009 News in 1978. Well.... it probably was, for this is just one such project. Bearing in mind that Garn has 1.5 exhibition outings in 2010, I thought it wise to build-up the motive power base a little knowing how shows can quickly wipe-out 009 locos. A few years ago I started picking up Egger/Jouef stock partly for a retro-layout and partly for a continental tramway idea. Therefore there have been several (5) locos in the loft awaiting attention. Knowing full well that the first idea probably won't happen I made a decision to convert a couple to run on Garn. This is the first.
Sunday, 1 November 2009
ExpoNG yesterday. Great show. One of the better ones of recent years, although the list published hadn’t filled me with expectation. What I went to see was Chris Peacock’s Cotehele; though in the end it sort of disappointed me and I couldn’t put my finger on why. Expong however is less about exhibits and more about talking. After you have been working in narrow gauge scales for twenty five years, it seems as though your whole social base is in this room- well mine is. I was in the hall for the best part of five hours and didn’t stop talking the entire time.
Likes and dislikes? Well apart from the above I was rather taken with Don Sibley’s Willowdale Light which, when you could see around Don, stood up better in the flesh than in photos; which is not always the case, and Tom Dauben’s Dunbracken which rightly walked away with the Hendriksen Trophy. He was smiling broadly afterwards – I know how he felt, I smiled for days after Wood End got it in 2000. What this did do was bring this back into its rightful territory of the ‘spirit’ of Reinier’s work. To my mind there have been a couple of dodgy presentations of the RH in recent years; ones which were a long way from spirit and even scale, for surely this is a 4mm scale award?
The day threw up (as it always does) a lot of what’s next? Garn was taken off its shelf a couple of days ago, due to the stalling of the DMU project, and looked at – looked at hard. What do I want to do with this? It has not grabbed the public attention the way Wood End did and I’m not sure why as it is more or less the same basic idea and techniques. It’s not going to get binned – not yet anyway, but it does need attention – re-grassing in places and the ballast in some lights looks weedy and overgrown and in others just badly done. I have on this point alone started chipping away at some of the errant lumps of magnesium chips in an effort to tidy it up.
Is 009 the direction in which I want to go? Does this fulfill the sort of modelling that I wish to do and possibly exhibit? The irony is that now I have more time to exhibit layouts, the invites do not come. Contrast this to a few years ago when I had to fend them off with a cricket bat.
I’ll return to this point no doubt.
Monday, 26 October 2009
Wednesday, 21 October 2009
The more I move on and the older I get I realise that I get most satisfaction from the things I make myself. The huge range of commercial items is all well and good, but...
Tuesday, 20 October 2009
Wednesday, 14 October 2009
The title would indicate that this was at least a steam age piece, but no. It is historical in as much as the prototype units for the project were built almost 50 years ago by Pressed Steel in 1960, and as far as I know there are still a couple of them floating around the system. That’s the historical prototype; this is also a historical cut and shut conversion.
The Lima DMU appeared in, I think, 1980 and it wasn’t long before several people pointed out that it was in fact two Driving-Motor-Brake-Seconds, not a DMBS and a trailer, therefore not impossible, but unlikely. There appeared in the modelling press a number of articles demonstrating that it was easily possible to convert the Class117 DMBS into a Class 121 single unit. Three of these articles were squirreled away by yours truly: Colin Hayward RM May 1981, Chris Ellis Model Trains April 1981, Tim Shackleton MRJ 93. All articles approach it from a different angle: the MRJ is done much in the house style and is the extra work to end up with the Class 122. The RM and MRJ pieces are also much concerned with renewing or improving the drive. It was however the Model Trains piece which tipped me over the edge. Not only had I kept the articles, but somewhere along the line I’d picked up a Blue/Grey 2 car DMU. The proposed mid ‘80s Llynfordd layout would be just the place for a 121, to complement the Sprinter units.
I’m not a fan of cut and shuts and even with the aid of an engineer’s square and masking tape guides I didn’t get the cuts spot on... but it’s OK. This is very much a work in progress post; the basic body mod’s are done and the roof strip replaced. That however is far from it finished. The bufferbeams need a lot of work (the couplings WILL come off this time) and there are steps to add. The inside will need some attention too. I seem to remember, on my one and only DMU trip that the seats were a standard BR blue cloth. There is the possibility that this work could go on and on up to the mythical MRJ standard –if I were capable that is, but I may just draw the line at a basic conversion.
Sunday, 11 October 2009
Meanwhile here's the Egger Diesel on a short goods.
Monday, 28 September 2009
A quick snap of the finished VGA. The first shot is the lowered by 2mm, but otherwise untouched model. The second is the repainted and complete refurbishment.
Saturday, 26 September 2009
Thursday, 24 September 2009
Note also the hand-carved postbox mounted on a matchstick. I find it better to just add one or two little details like this to catch the eye rather than cram a layout with all the MickeyMouse flashing-light extras. Less is more.
Wednesday, 23 September 2009
Tuesday, 22 September 2009
I feel a return to the ‘small project’ coming on. Not that was ever into the large ones per se. Those never-ending -life’s work layouts all seemed a little beyond me, Buckingham excepted. The fact that someone can spend a lifetimes modelling working on one project is quite frankly beyond my comprehension; I just have too many ideas and too many interests within the hobby. Even after a major clear-out a couple of years ago where thirty years of modelling rubbish went to landfill, I still have three boxes of stuff in the loft. Now I realise that three boxes to some people is a mere drop in the ocean, but three boxes is two boxes too much. Much of what is in these boxes are the ‘one-day projects’, not as in 24 hours, but things that will get done one day. Single projects or ideas that have been the first step for a new idea – the VGA below is an example. Others would be the Lima 117 DMU into a single car unit after the MRJ article more than a few years ago. That’s been around so long that even Lima beat me to it. Now with two layouts on the exhibition circuit I really should work through some of these existing ideas, even though most of them have no particular place to end up. After all, they are in the most part, paid for; there is no more outlay. They are modelling for its own sake.
Isn’t that why we all started?